Lawsuit Leads To Cancellation Of Popular Pumpkin Hurling Contest

Punkin Chunkin 5There probably hasn’t been more disappointment associated with a pumpkin-related event since the Great Pumpkin failed to show up for Linus and Sally in the beloved TV special, “It’s the Great Pumpkin, Charlie Brown.” I’m talking about the cancellation of the annual World Championship Punkin Chunkin competition in Delaware after nearly 30 years.

No, I’m not out of my gourd. This is a serious event that has had a major positive economic impact on the rural part of Delaware that has hosted the competition. As many as 20,000 fans have travelled to Sussex County in recent years to see pumpkins be launched in the air via slingshots, catapults and even pneumatic cannons.

The event started in 1986, and there’s an interesting history of the competition on the Punkin Chunkin website. Despite its enormous popularity – it was even featured on the Discovery Channel’s, Mythbusters, show – it was cancelled in 2014 and won’t be held this year, either.

Why? A couple of years ago, a volunteer was injured in an ATV accident and filed a lawsuit. Daniel Fair was a “spotter” and, along with others, rode an all-terrain vehicle through a field to help determine the distances competitors flung their pumpkins. The ATV he was riding flipped in 2011, and he suffered serious injuries. He filed a lawsuit seeking at least $4.5 million in damages.

The Wilmington News Journal reported that owner of the farm argued there was nothing inherently dangerous about the path Fair was riding on and that “its existence was obvious and known to all.” It estimates that “Fair, a repeat volunteer, drove an ATV over it 150 times between 2007 and 2011 without a problem, as did plenty of other people.”

The lawsuit was eventually dismissed, but the parties settled out of court. Of course, that started a domino effect, and now, affordable insurance for the event is impossible to find, and the farmer who hosted it won’t let it return to his property.

That’s a shame. In a news report that aired on ABC-affiliate, WMDT-TV, Delaware Senator Brian Pettyjohn noted that in addition to all of the economic benefits enjoyed by the local businesses who served the thousands of people who came to the event, Punkin Chunkin raised $50,000 for student scholarships and $100,000 for charities over the years.

To help save the event, Senator Pettyjohn introduced legislation to cap pain-and-suffering awards in lawsuits against non-profit charities sponsoring annual events, but as WMDT reported in a follow-up story, it was blocked in committee, and “supporters of the bill said lobbying by trial lawyers defeated the measure.”

So, is the Punkin Chunkin competition history? An article on the Delaware Surf Fishing website reports that “due to this lack of protection, Punkin Chunkin organizers are starting to look out of state” for a new location.

To stop that from happening, a grassroots movement called #savethechunk has now sprouted up on Facebook and Twitter, and leaders of the effort still hope to convince Delaware legislators to enact legislation that will allow the event to remain in that state.

This situation reminds me of a time when a group of citizens in Connecticut rallied to keep public bike trails open there after a lawsuit by an injured biker forced the trails to be closed. I discussed this on my blog at the time, and a groundswell of public support led by hardworking volunteers there eventually led to legislation being enacted that allowed the trails to re-open. If it could be done in Connecticut, it can be done in Delaware.

Hat tip to Walter Olson for alerting us to this story on

New Report Reveals Massive Influence Of Trial Lawyers In Washington D.C. Just As Their Lobbyists Warn President Obama Not To Support Tort Reform

An important new report recently released by the Manhattan Institute shines a bright spotlight on the tidal wave of campaign contributions flowing from personal injury lawyers to members of Congress. Get your free copy of the report here.

According to the Manhattan Institute, the amount of money being poured into the leadership of the U.S. Senate by personal injury lawyers now dwarfs contributions by all other industries. As evidence, the Manhattan Institute reveals that four of the top seven political donors to Majority Leader Harry Reid are plaintiff law firms.

It wouldn’t take a cynic to come to the conclusion that this financial relationship does not bode well for those who support efforts in Congress aimed at eliminating lawsuit abuse. But now, the story is getting even more interesting, and the stakes are as high as ever.

Yesterday, a headline in The Hill, a daily newspaper that covers Congress, declared: Trial Lawyers to Obama: Don’t deal on tort reform in healthcare negotiations. See full article here. Although the President has suggested in the past that there might be some kind of reform he’d support to eliminate meritless lawsuits against doctors, reformers have been waiting for him to support anything they consider meaningful.

The Manhattan Institute study and yesterday’s article in The Hill focus on trial lawyer influence in the nation’s capitol, but the decisions being made in Washington D.C. also have a huge impact on what is likely to happen in the states when it comes to medical liability reform.

When the Senate finally mustered enough votes to approve a heath care reform bill last December, the “tort reform” section in the bill that created demonstration projects in the states was considered a “gift” to trial lawyers. It didn’t do anything to encourage states to enact proposals to eliminate lawsuit abuse. Manhattan Institute Senior Fellow, Walter Olson, said all it did was “provide cover to lawmakers who feel they need to tell voters they did something on the tort reform front while guaranteeing that it won’t amount to anything that would bother the trial bar.”

Will President Obama’s recent statements finally move reform efforts forward? If so, he’ll need to convince Congress to encourage the states to approve reforms that actually bother the trial bar.